so the back ground is carb operation
they are mfg with tolerances to compensate for metal expansion and shrinking--not rocket science
they were designed based on a fuel that has been made to use fuel that evaporated much slower than what is available today
therefore, would it make sense that tolerances approaching the former mid to max limits would now not be acceptable to operate
my guess is that a fuel that evaporates quicker must be lighter and or thinner, which would magnify the allowable tolerances
and yes i am still jacking with the 300 6---i think i will say that carter yf and yfa carbs are my nemesis--gonna build the holley 1940--looks like the roch 2gc problem has been the power valve and i found a good place to buy individual carb parts instead of buying a whole kit--i bookmarked so many--i'll compile them later
please add your fuel knowledge
they are mfg with tolerances to compensate for metal expansion and shrinking--not rocket science
they were designed based on a fuel that has been made to use fuel that evaporated much slower than what is available today
therefore, would it make sense that tolerances approaching the former mid to max limits would now not be acceptable to operate
my guess is that a fuel that evaporates quicker must be lighter and or thinner, which would magnify the allowable tolerances
and yes i am still jacking with the 300 6---i think i will say that carter yf and yfa carbs are my nemesis--gonna build the holley 1940--looks like the roch 2gc problem has been the power valve and i found a good place to buy individual carb parts instead of buying a whole kit--i bookmarked so many--i'll compile them later
please add your fuel knowledge